Removal Selectivity and Advanced Filtration Membranes across Pharmaceutical Wastewater Plants

Authors

  • Sebastian Krause Department of Forest Botany and Tree Physiology, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany Author
  • Christian Braun Department of Forest Botany and Tree Physiology, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany Author

Keywords:

Advanced Filtration, Removal Selectivity, Lifecycle Assessment, Pharmaceutical Wastewater, Membrane Technology

Abstract

The rapid escalation of pharmaceutical residues in aquatic environments poses severe ecological and public health challenges worldwide. Conventional wastewater treatment plants frequently fail to eliminate these complex synthetic compounds, necessitating the deployment of advanced filtration membranes. While nanofiltration and reverse osmosis demonstrate remarkable removal selectivity for active pharmaceutical ingredients, their energy-intensive nature and material manufacturing processes generate substantial environmental burdens. This paper provides a comprehensive investigation linking the physical and chemical selectivity of advanced filtration membranes to their holistic environmental impacts through a rigorous lifecycle assessment framework. Drawing on empirical data from a pilot-scale pharmaceutical wastewater treatment plant, this study evaluates the operational efficacy and environmental footprint of thin-film composite polyamide membranes. The analysis spans the entire lifecycle, from membrane fabrication and system operation to end-of-life disposal, quantifying trade-offs between removal efficiency and global warming potential, resource depletion, and human toxicity. Findings reveal that while high-selectivity membranes achieve near-complete retention of recalcitrant pharmaceutical compounds, the associated energy demands during the operational phase dominate the overall lifecycle impact. The study proposes optimization strategies, including energy recovery devices and alternative low-fouling membrane materials, to reconcile the conflict between exceptional water purification standards and environmental sustainability. This research offers critical insights for environmental engineers, policymakers, and plant operators striving to implement sustainable advanced wastewater treatment paradigms.

References

1. Qin, J.; Feng, M.; Cao, Q. Processing Optimization for Halbach Array Magnetic Field-Assisted Magnetic Abrasive Particles Polishing of Titanium Alloy. Materials 2024, 17, 3213.

2. Martins, R.S.; Salar, H.; Salar, M.; Luo, J.; Poulikidis, K.; Razi, S.S.; Latif, M.J.; Tafuri, K.; Bhora, F.Y. Making minimally invasive procedures more sustainable: A systematic review comparing the environmental footprint of single-use versus multi-use instruments. World J. Surg. 2024, 48, 2212–2223.

3. Su, H.; Yang, C.; Fu, Y.; Nie, R. Analysis of Honing Material Removal Rate and Surface Quality Using Electroplated Oilstone. Materials 2024, 17, 6170.

4. Wang, H.; Wang, C.; Dang, J.; Guo, G.; An, Q.; Ming, W.; Chen, M. Microscale Mechanism of Material Removal Process on Burr Defect Formation in Grinding Superalloy Honeycomb Composites. J. Manuf. Process. 2025, 147, 133–150.

5. Liu, Z.; Song, K.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, K.; Jiang, R.; Liao, Z.; Zou, L.; Huang, Y. Enhancement of Grinding Titanium Alloy Fatigue Performance via Synergistic Effect of Low Surface Roughness and Gradient Microstructure. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 2025, 104008.

6. Bo, F.; Liu, Y.; Mo, L.; Wang, S.; Hu, F. Rapid Manufacturing Technology of Integral Hydraulic Valves Based on 3D Printing. Chin. J. Lasers-Zhongguo Jiguang 2025, 52, 1202311.

7. Dai, Y.; Li, S.; Feng, M.; Chen, B.; Qiao, J. Fundamental Study of Phased Array Ultrasonic Cavitation Abrasive Flow Polishing Titanium Alloy Tubes. Materials 2024, 17, 5185.

8. Shrivastava, P.; Msomi, V.; Mabuwa, S. Friction stir welding of metal matrix composites for automotive applications: A comprehensive review. Mater. Today Commun. 2026, 52, 114987.

9. Qu, S.; Yang, Y.; Yao, P.; Li, L.; Sun, Y.; Chu, D. Fiber Reinforced Ceramic Matrix Composites: From the Controlled Fabrication to Precision Machining. Int. J. Extreme Manuf. 2025, 7, 62004.

10. Patel, P.; Dutta, A.; Ghosh, A.; Basak, S.; Sahoo, S.K.; Sahoo, N.; Shrivastava, P.; Das, A.; Msomi, V. Advances in welding of titanium and its alloys using CMT, MIG, and laser-MIG hybrid processes: A comprehensive review. Mater. Today Commun. 2026, 53, 115264.

11. Minguella-Canela, J.; Morales Planas, S.; De Los Santos-Lopez, M.A. SLM Manufacturing Redesign of Cooling Inserts for High Production Steel Moulds and Benchmarking with Other Industrial Additive Manufacturing Strategies. Materials 2020, 13, 4843.

12. Song, J.; Wang, B.; Hao, X. Optimization Algorithms and Their Applications and Prospects in Manufacturing Engineering. Materials 2024, 17, 4093.

13. Wang, X.; Wang, X.; Shi, S.; Zhang, B.; Jiang, N.; Tang, J. Abrasive Flow Machining Ground Surfaces with Grinding Marks of Different Directions: Parameters Optimization and Mechanisms. J. Manuf. Process. 2025, 148, 212–223.

14. Smesseim, I.; Daniels, J.M.; Annema, J.; Bonta, P.I.; Slebos, D.-J. Disposable Versus Reusable Bronchoscopes: A Narrative Review of Cost-effectiveness, Risk of Cross-contamination and Environmental Impact. Arch. Bronconeumol. 2024, 60, 250–252.

15. Li, X.; Gao, C.; Yuan, D.; Qin, Y.; Fu, D.; Jiang, X.; Zhou, W. Fabrication of Ceramic Microchannels with Periodic Corrugated Microstructures as Catalyst Support for Hydrogen Production via Diamond Wire Sawing. Materials 2024, 17, 2535.

16. Ojeda-Hernández, D.D.; Canales-Aguirre, A.A.; Matias-Guiu, J.; Gomez-Pinedo, U.; Mateos-Díaz, J.C. Potential of chitosan and its derivatives for biomedical applications in the central nervous system. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 389.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-21

Issue

Section

Articles