Precision Agriculture Robots for Input Optimization in Greenhouse Vegetable Production: Experimental Analysis

Authors

  • Asuka Nakayama Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan Author
  • Ayumi Ogawa Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan Author

Keywords:

Precision Agriculture, Agricultural Robotics, Input Optimization, Controlled Environment Agriculture, Greenhouse Vegetable Production

Abstract

The integration of robotic systems into agricultural environments represents a critical paradigm shift aimed at addressing the dual challenges of global food security and environmental sustainability. This study presents a comprehensive experimental analysis investigating the direct linkage between the deployment of precision agriculture robots and input optimization in greenhouse vegetable production. By conducting a longitudinal experiment over a complete crop cycle, this research evaluates how autonomous ground vehicles equipped with advanced multispectral imaging and targeted micro-dispensing capabilities influence the consumption rates of critical inputs, specifically irrigation water, synthetic fertilizers, and chemical pesticides. The methodology contrasts a conventionally managed greenhouse zone with a strictly robot-managed zone, measuring resource utilization, crop yield, and plant health metrics. The findings demonstrate substantial reductions in input usage without compromising agricultural output, thereby validating the economic and environmental viability of robotic interventions. Furthermore, this paper elucidates the underlying mechanisms by which high-resolution spatial and temporal data collection enables micro-level resource allocation, shifting the agricultural framework from uniform application to plant-specific optimization. The resulting evidence provides a foundational framework for future implementations of scalable robotic solutions in controlled environment agriculture, ultimately contributing to more resilient and resource-efficient food production systems.

References

1. Kluczka, J. Chitosan: Structural and chemical modification, properties, and application. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 25, 554.

2. Klein, M.P.; Hackenhaar, C.R.; Lorenzoni, A.S.G.; Rodrigues, R.C.; Costa, T.M.H.; Ninow, J.L.; Hertz, P.F. Chitosan crosslinked with genipin as support matrix for application in food process: Support characterization and β-D-galactosidase immobilization. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 137, 184–190.

3. Li, Z.; Cai, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, X. Slurry Pressure at the Cutting Zone in Multi-Wire Sawing: An Experimental Study. J. Manuf. Process. 2023, 106, 130–138.

4. Fulmer, R.; Joerin, A.; Gentile, B.; Lakerink, L.; Rauws, M. Using Psychological Artificial Intelligence (Tess) to Relieve Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Ment. Health 2018, 5, e64.

5. Mckay, M.D.; Beckman, R.J.; Conover, W.J. A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code. Technometrics 1979, 21, 239–245.

6. Sweeney, A.-M.; Kavanagh, G.; Deasy, K.F.; Danish, H.; Gomez, F.; Henry, M.T.; Murphy, D.M.; Plant, B.J.; Kennedy, M.P. Single-Use or Disposable Flexible Bronchoscopy in Advanced Bronchoscopy Procedures: Experience in a Quaternary Referral Centre. Respiration 2022, 101, 931–938.

7. Román-Doval, R.; Torres-Arellanes, S.P.; Tenorio-Barajas, A.Y.; Gómez-Sánchez, A.; Valencia-Lazcano, A.A. Chitosan: Properties and its application in agriculture in context of molecular weight. Polymers 2023, 15, 2867.

8. Li, J.; Ong, Y.C.; Muhamad, W.M.W. Optimization Design of Injection Mold Conformal Cooling Channel for Improving Cooling Rate. Processes 2024, 12, 1232.

9. Akakuru, O.U.; Isiuku, B.O. Chitosan hydrogels and their glutaraldehyde-crosslinked counterparts as potential drug release and tissue engineering systems—Synthesis, characterization, swelling kinetics and mechanism. J. Phys. Chem. Biophys. 2017, 7, 1000256.

10. Aussel, A.; Montembault, A.; Malaise, S.; Foulc, M.P.; Faure, W.; Cornet, S.; Aid, R.; Chaouat, M.; Delair, T.; Letourneur, D.; et al. In vitro mechanical property evaluation of chitosan-based hydrogels intended for vascular graft development. J. Cardiovasc. Trans. Res. 2017, 10, 480–488.

11. Wang, X.; Wei, Y.; Guo, Z.; Wang, J.; Yu, H.; Hu, B. A Sinh–Cosh-Enhanced DBO Algorithm Applied to Global Optimization Problems. Biomimetics 2024, 9, 271.

12. Xu, X.; Cui, H.; Lan, L.; Shao, C.; Wang, Y.; Lu, F. Improvement of weld formation and mechanical properties in high-speed spiral oscillating laser–arc hybrid welding of medium-thick Al–Mg–Er–Zr alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2026, 958, 149999.

13. Zhang, R.; Lv, Q.; Li, J.; Bao, J.; Liu, T.; Liu, S. A reinforcement learning method for human-robot collaboration in assembly tasks. Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 2022, 73, 102227.

14. Ni, C.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, B.; An, K.; Wang, Y.; Liu, D.; Lu, W.; Zhu, L.; Liu, C. Recent advance in laser powder bed fusion of Ti-6Al-4V alloys: Microstructure, mechanical properties and machinability. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 2025, 20, e2446952.

15. Heidari, A.A.; Mirjalili, S.A.; Faris, H.; Aljarah, I.; Mafarja, M.; Chen, H. Harris hawks optimization: Algorithm and applications. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2019, 97, 849–872.

16. Mirjalili, S. Moth-flame optimization algorithm: A novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm. Knowl. Based Syst. 2015, 89, 228–249.

17. Li, Y.; Zhao, L.; Wang, Y.; Wen, Q. Improved sand cat swarm optimization algorithm for enhancing coverage of wireless sensor networks. Measurement 2024, 233, 114649.

18. Wolpert, D.H.; Macready, W.G. No free lunch theorems for optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 1997, 1, 67–82.

19. Zhong, C.; Li, G.; Meng, Z. Beluga whale optimization: A novel nature-inspired metaheuristic algorithm. Knowl. Based Syst. 2022, 251, 109215.

20. Roumy, L.; Touchard, F.; Truong-Hoang, T.-Q.; Martinez-Hergueta, F. Electroconductive Thermosensitive Shape Memory Polymers Manufactured by Fused Filament Fabrication: A Critical Review. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 11641.

21. Jasik, K.; Sniezek, L.; Kluczynski, J. Additive Manufacturing of Metals Using the MEX Method: Process Characteristics and Performance Properties-A Review. Materials 2025, 18, 2744.

22. Zhang, F.; Liu, M.; Wan, H. Discussion about several potential drawbacks of PEGylated therapeutic proteins. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2014, 37, 335–339.

23. Mohammad, A.; Tuhin, M. A review of applications of collaborative robot in welding and additive manufacturing. Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 2026, 100, 103256.

24. Zhu, Y.; Huang, H.; Wei, J.; Yi, J.; Liu, J.; Li, M. ISO: An improved snake optimizer with multi-strategy enhancement for engineering optimization. Expert Syst. Appl. 2025, 281, 127660.

25. Kumar, G.; Chakladar, N.D.; Paul, S. Modelling and Experimental Validation of the Multi-Grit Grinding Process. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2025, 307, 110900.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-21

Issue

Section

Articles