Estimating Cell Viability in Regenerative Medicine Labs from Biofabrication Scaffold Design
Keywords:
Biofabrication, Cell Viability, Lifecycle Assessment, Regenerative Medicine, Biofabrication Scaffold DesignAbstract
This paper presents a novel methodology that bridges the gap between biological performance and environmental sustainability in regenerative medicine. Traditionally, the design of biofabrication scaffolds has focused exclusively on optimizing mechanical properties, degradation rates, and cytocompatibility to maximize cell viability. However, the energy-intensive processes, raw material extraction, and chemical waste generated during these laboratory-scale activities exert a significant environmental toll. This study introduces an integrated framework that utilizes environmental Lifecycle Assessment as a predictive tool to evaluate cell viability while simultaneously quantifying environmental impacts. By establishing a direct link between scaffold design parameters, manufacturing energy demands, and cellular outcomes, we demonstrate that environmental inventory data can serve as an indirect indicator of laboratory-scale cytotoxicity. Using human mesenchymal stem cells as a model biological system, we systematically analyze various synthetic and natural polymeric scaffolds. Our findings suggest that optimizing scaffold design for minimal ecological footprints, such as reducing solvent volumes and thermal energy inputs during fabrication, correlates strongly with improved cellular viability due to the reduction of residual toxic reagents and process-induced shear stress. This work establishes a dual-objective optimization paradigm that helps researchers design highly viable tissue constructs without compromising global ecological systems.References
1. Wan, K.; Li, J.; Li, D.; Ge, J.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Guo, Y.; Guo, J.; Leng, M.; Wang, P.; et al. Novel hydroxybutyl chitosan nanoparticles for siRNA delivery targeting tissue factor inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in human vascular smooth muscle cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 12, 7957–7962.
2. Vernaez, O.; Neubert, K.J.; Kopitzky, R.; Kabasci, S. Compatibility of chitosan in polymer blends by chemical modification of bio-based polyesters. Polymers 2019, 11, 1939.
3. Mathews, D.T.; Birney, Y.A.; Cahill, P.A.; McGuinness, G.B. Vascular cell viability on polyvinyl alcohol hydrogels modified with water-soluble and -insoluble chitosan. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2008, 84, 531–540.
4. Maleki, S.; Shamloo, A.; Kalantarnia, F. Tubular TPU/SF nanofibers covered with chitosan-based hydrogels as small-diameter vascular grafts with enhanced mechanical properties. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 6179.
5. El Chawich, G.; El Hayek, J.; Rouessac, V.; Cot, D.; Rebiere, B.; Habchi, R.; Garay, H.; Bechelany, M.; Zakhour, M.; Miele, P.; et al. Design and Manufacturing of Si-Based Non-Oxide Cellular Ceramic Structures through Indirect 3D Printing. Materials 2022, 15, 471.
6. Caliskan, C.I.; Ozer, G.; Koc, E.; Saritas, U.S.; Yildiz, C.F.; Cicek, O.Y. Efficiency Research of Conformal Channel Geometries Produced by Additive Manufacturing in Plastic Injection Mold Cores (Inserts) Used in Automotive Industry. 3D Print. Addit. Manuf. 2023, 10, 213–225.
7. Devernois, E.; Coradin, T. Synthesis, characterization and biological properties of type I collagen–chitosan mixed hydrogels: A review. Gels 2023, 9, 518.
8. Feng, S.; Kamat, A.M.; Pei, Y. Design and fabrication of conformal cooling channels in molds: Review and progress updates. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2021, 171, 121082.
9. Lyu, J.; Liu, X.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X. Applications of Multifunctional Hydrogel in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. MedComm 2026, 7, e70602.
10. Elango, J. Proliferative and osteogenic supportive effect of VEGF-loaded collagen-chitosan hydrogel system in bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 1297.
11. Boroda, A.; Privar, Y.; Maiorova, M.; Beleneva, I.; Eliseikina, M.; Skatova, A.; Marinin, D.; Bratskaya, S. Chitosan versus carboxymethyl chitosan cryogels: Bacterial colonization, human embryonic kidney 293T cell culturing and co-culturing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12276.
12. Baysal, K.; Aroguz, A.Z.; Adiguzel, Z.; Baysal, B.M. Chitosan/alginate crosslinked hydrogels: Preparation, characterization and application for cell growth purposes. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 59, 342–348.
13. Mahmoudi, N.; Simchi, A. On the biological performance of graphene oxide-modified chitosan/polyvinyl pyrrolidone nanocomposite membranes: In vitro and in vivo effects of graphene oxide. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 70, 121–131.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), unless otherwise stated.