Task Safety with Human Augmentation Interfaces in Logistics Warehouse Operations: Finite Element Modeling

Authors

  • Jackson Stewart Civil and Urban Engineering Department, Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, New York, USA Author
  • David Li Civil and Urban Engineering Department, Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, New York, USA Author

Keywords:

Human Augmentation, Finite Element Modeling, Biomechanics, Occupational Safety, Logistics Ergonomics

Abstract

The rapid expansion of global e-commerce has significantly intensified manual material handling demands within logistics warehouse operations, leading to an increased prevalence of occupational musculoskeletal disorders. Human augmentation technologies, particularly wearable exoskeletons, have emerged as a promising intervention to mitigate physical strain among warehouse workers. However, the physical interface between the mechanical structure and the human body introduces novel safety risks, including localized tissue ischemia, pressure ulcers, and neuromuscular compression. This paper presents a comprehensive safety assessment of human augmentation interfaces using advanced finite element modeling techniques. By simulating the complex biomechanical interactions between the rigid exoskeleton components and the deformable human soft tissues during typical warehouse tasks, this study provides quantitative evidence on contact pressure distributions and internal tissue strains. The methodology employs hyperelastic constitutive models to represent human skin, adipose tissue, and muscle, subjected to dynamic loading conditions representative of repetitive lifting and carrying. The results indicate that peak contact pressures frequently exceed physiological capillary closure thresholds under heavy loads, highlighting significant risks of soft tissue injury over cumulative shifts. Furthermore, the analysis reveals that subdermal shear stresses are concentrated at the edges of the physical interfaces, necessitating immediate design optimizations. The findings offer critical insights for ergonomists and engineers, establishing finite element modeling as an essential tool for evaluating and certifying the task safety of human augmentation systems prior to widespread industrial deployment.

References

1. Kiliç, R.; Güzel, T.; Aktan, A.; Kaya, A.F. Comparison of chitosan-containing hemostatic pad and manual compression after coronary angiography with femoral access. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Sci. 2024, 37, e20240020.

2. Kaya, M.; Baran, T.; Asan-Ozusaglam, M.; Cakmak, Y.S.; Tozak, K.O.; Mol, A.; Mentes, A.; Sezen, G. Extraction and characterization of chitin and chitosan with antimicrobial and antioxidant activities from cosmopolitan orthoptera species (insecta). Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2015, 20, 168–179.

3. Vijayan, A.A.S.; Kumar, G.S.V. PEG grafted chitosan scaffold for dual growth factor delivery for enhanced wound healing. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 19165.

4. Cambria, E.; Poria, S.; Hazarika, D.; Kwok, K. SenticNet 5: Discovering Conceptual Primitives for Sentiment Analysis by Means of Context Embeddings. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, New Orleans, LA, USA, 2–7 February 2018; Volume 32.

5. Jang, J.; Byeon, J.; Jung, D.; Chang, J.; Youm, S. Pose-Driven Body Shape Prediction Algorithm Based on Conditional GAN. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 7643.

6. Peng, C.; Gao, H.; Wang, X. On Characterization of Shear Viscosity and Wall Slip for Concentrated Suspension Flows in Abrasive Flow Machining. Materials 2023, 16, 6803.

7. Shneiderman, B. Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthy. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2020, 36, 495–504.

8. Weiser, M. The Computer for the 21st Century. Sci. Am. 1991, 265, 94–104.

9. European Commission High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence. Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2019.

10. Picard, R.W. Affective Computing; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1997.

11. Poria, S.; Cambria, E.; Bajpai, R.; Hussain, A. A Review of Affective Computing: From Unimodal Analysis to Multimodal Fusion. Inf. Fusion 2017, 37, 98–125.

12. Martinez, B.; Valstar, M.F.; Jiang, B.; Pantic, M. Automatic Analysis of Facial Actions: A Survey. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 2019, 10, 325–347.

13. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1; W3C Recommendation; WorldWideWeb Consortium (W3C): Wakefield, MA, USA, 2018.

14. Topol, E. Deep Medicine: How Artificial Intelligence Can Make Healthcare Human Again; Basic Books: New York, NY, USA, 2019.

15. Calvo, R.A.; Peters, D. Positive Computing: Technology for Wellbeing and Human Potential; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014.

16. Ekman, P. Emotions Revealed; Times Books: New York, NY, USA, 2003.

17. Savary, M.; Sazedj, S.; Pinto, J.F.G.D.C. Chitin and chitosan: Structure, properties and applications, some perspective on building preservation. MATEC Web Conf. 2024, 396, 02002.

18. Younes, I.; Rinaudo, M. Chitin and chitosan preparation from marine sources. structure, properties and applications. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 1133–1174.

19. Chenite, A.; Chaput, C.; Wang, D.; Combes, C.; Buschmann, M.D.; Hoemann, C.D.; Leroux, J.C.; Atkinson, B.L.; Binette, F.; Selmani, A. Novel injectable neutral solutions of chitosan form biodegradable gels in situ. Biomaterials 2000, 21, 2155–2161.

20. Tan, H.; Rubin, J.P.; Marra, K.G. Injectable in situ forming biodegradable chitosan-hyaluronic acid based hydrogels for adipose tissue regeneration. Organogenesis 2010, 6, 173–180.

21. Sommer, K.; Sammler, F.; Heiler, R.; Pfennig, A. Microstructure, mechanical properties, and geometric deviations of additively manufactured LPBF-IN718 lattice structures. Prakt. Metallogr. Metallogr. 2025, 62, 863–883.

22. Malekan, M.; Sigurjonsson, B. On the mechanical behavior of polymeric lattice structures fabricated by stereolithography 3D printing. Eng. Rep. 2024, 6, e13003.

23. Gierszewska-Drużyńskaska, M.; Ostrowska-Czubenko, J. Structural and swelling properties of hydrogel membranes based on chitosan crosslinked with glutaraldehyde and sodium tripolyphosphate. Prog. Chem. Appl. Chitin Its Deriv. 2015, 20, 43–53.

24. Li, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wei, Y.; Tao, L. Preparation of chitosan-based injectable hydrogels and its application in 3D cell culture. J. Vis. Exp. 2017, 127, e56253.

25. Struz, J.; Trochta, M.; Hruzik, L.; Pistacek, D.; Stawarz, S.; Kucharczyk, W.; Rucki, M. Wear and Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) of Samples Produced via Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) 3D Printing Method. Polymers 2024, 16, 3018.

26. Ji, C.; Annabi, N.; Khademhosseini, A.; Dehghani, F. Fabrication of porous chitosan scaffolds for soft tissue engineering using dense gas CO2. Acta Biomater. 2011, 7, 1653–1664.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-31

Issue

Section

Articles